Tonight's Chemtrails Over the Gulf of Mexico

Chemtrails over Dallas

http://www.wfaa.com/younews/101368309.html

Rainbow Clouds & Chemtrails over Dallas
by dallasgoldbug
Posted on: Aug 24, 2010 at 6:59 AM CDT
Channel: Weather
Location: Dallas TX NW HWY and ABRAMS

The Chemtrail spraying over Dallas has picked up this week. Every day they continue their so called weather modification initiative. But today the spray or the frequencies they are bouncing off of it produced rainbow clouds. I managed to get home just in time to catch the tail end of the rainbow cloud. You can just make out the Blue color. 20 mins before ROYGBIV was viable. Remember Roy G Biv, from school? Red, Orange,Yellow etc.

Landsat 7 Broken

Just received this email and am wondering if those in control are causing/allowing this to keep curious scientists in the dark about chemtrails and other nefarious activities done by the nwo goons...

http://nature.berkeley.edu/blogs/news/2010/08/dimmer_view_of_earth.php

Isn't this curious? Could the "lines without data" be chemtrails? Or am I just totally lacking in respect for scientists. Could they actually come up with a cockamamy story like this, or are the satellites all really defunct? Am I just too jaded?

VW in Berkley

Dimmer view of Earth
By Suzanne Bohan
Contra Costa Times

Posted: 08/08/2010 12:00:00 AM PDT
original article source: http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_15689266?nclick_check=1

When Stanford climate scientist Christopher Field looks at visual feeds from a satellite monitoring deforestation in the Amazon basin, he sees images streaked with white lines devoid of data.

The satellite, Lansat 7, is broken. And it's emblematic of the nation's battered satellite environmental monitoring program. The bad news: It's only going to get worse, unless the federal agencies criticized for their poor management of the satellite systems over the past decade stage a fast turnaround. Many, however, view that prospect as a long shot.

"I would say our ability to observe the Earth from space is at grave risk of dying from neglect," said Field, director of the Department of Global Ecology at the Carnegie Institution for Science at Stanford University.

Inez Fung, a noted climatologist at UC Berkeley, was shocked as she scanned a recent federal report warning of impending gaps in the country's ability to monitor Earth from space.

The federal document, released in May, listed cuts in climate-monitoring sensors from the next generation of Earth-observing satellites. The current satellites beam down many types of indispensable data about the planet, such as ocean currents, ozone levels and snow cover, as well as the pictures we see every day on TV weathercasts.

But key instruments on the new satellites have been eliminated: Gone is a sensor that would relay new data about the atmosphere and environmental conditions in the ocean and along coastal areas, including those in California. The movement of pollutants and greenhouse gases would have been under the instrument's mechanical gaze, as well.

Also absent is a critical sensor that monitors temperature changes over time on Earth.

"That's like if you have a sick patient, and then say, 'I have no more thermometers,'" Fung said.

In all, nine new climate instruments on the next generation of satellites were canceled or their capabilities scaled back in 2006, according to the Government Accountability Office report. The office is the investigative arm of the U.S. Congress, assessing the performance of federal agencies.

Combined with a five-year delay in launching these next-generation satellites, with the first scheduled to blast off in 2011, these canceled or "degraded" instruments leave the nation facing critical gaps in satellite monitoring of the planet beginning in 2015, the report stated. And a National Academy of Sciences analysis of the disarray in the satellite program stressed that because of Earth's growing population, it's more crucial than ever to monitor pollution, water quality, land use and other environmental conditions.

Casting blame

Many blame the cuts on Bush administration policies that favored manned moon and Mars missions over shoring up aging Earth-observing satellite systems. Critics cite a 30 percent decline between 2000 and 2006 in NASA's Earth science budget -- which funds environmental satellites -- as evidence of the administration's lukewarm support of keeping an eye on the planet's condition. The National Academy of Sciences report, along with a chorus of experts in the field, also warns that the country is at risk of losing its worldwide technological leadership in Earth-observing satellites.

Other casualties of the 2006 cuts include an instrument for tracking airborne particles such as sea spray, smog, volcanic ash and smoke -- all factors contributing to the warming or cooling of the planet. The inclusion of a new instrument for monitoring soil moisture was canceled, which would have yielded information valuable to, among others, farmers and those monitoring the spread of deserts worldwide.

These cuts spell a 46 percent decline in data about the Earth's conditions that these new satellites were designed to provide, and the Government Accountability Office report concluded that because of the trouble-plagued satellite program, "our nation's ability to understand climate change may be limited."

Those in the field use harsher language.

Many Earth-monitoring satellites "are really in desperate shape," said Field, with Stanford's Carnegie Institution.

He copes with the neglect daily. Field and his staff rely on data from Landsat 7, a satellite that malfunctioned in 2003 and is limping along at two-thirds its capacity. For example, when it flies over the Amazon basin, where it's used to monitor rain forest deforestation, it sends images marred by white lines showing where the satellite failed to gather data. To back up that defective machine, they use data sent by a 28-year-old satellite, Landsat 5, which was designed to last three years.

"Landsat 7 is just basically broken," Field said. He considers it a "miracle" that Landsat 5 still functions.

Help from above

In the 1960s, the United States began using satellites to observe its lands, oceans, atmosphere and the space environment near Earth. The satellites continuously monitor the planet's dynamic environment, and allow humans to peer into inaccessible places. Information beamed by these spacecraft is now essential for forecasting weather, tracking conditions on Earth and in its atmosphere, and projecting long-term climate trends. With satellite data, rising sea levels can be monitored, helping communities on islands and along coastal areas plan. Satellites help farmers assess soil conditions before planting, allow foresters to examine logging activities, let water managers monitor the mountain snowpack that provides water to cities, and track the migration of wildlife such as buffalo and elephants.

Satellite data is also essential for crafting international agreements for reducing global warming, said Molly Macauley, an economist with Resources for the Future, a research institute in Washington, D.C.

Delay now, pay later

Field, the Carnegie Institution scientist, echoed many of his colleagues' views in saying the cuts also reflect a lack of support for climate monitoring in particular during the Bush administration. Former President George W. Bush held that there was insufficient information to conclude global warming was caused by human activity, but that the economic harm of regulating heat-trapping gases was certain.

A May 2 article in Defense Industry Daily noted that "one of the most controversial decisions" after the 2006 reduction in satellite sensors was the fact that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Department of Defense "apparently chose not to seek additional funding" to retain the climate instruments. The agencies, along with NASA, jointly managed one of the programs, NPOESS. The other, GOES-R, is managed solely by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Had the agencies received more funding at that earlier stage, subsequent cost increases and launch delays could have been avoided, the prime contractor on the satellite program testified before Congress, according to the article. The NPOESS program, at nearly $14 billion in cost, is now more than $7 billion over its original estimate.

Jumping into the fray, the National Academy of Sciences in 2007 released a 455-page report on the nation's environmental satellite program, offering the most comprehensive recommendations to date for getting it back on track. Chief among them was an infusion of money for Earth-observing satellites. And the funding decline in the years before the report's release put the country's ability to monitor the climate and severe weather "at great risk," the academy report warned.

"There was a decreased emphasis on Earth observations" during the Bush administration, Field said. "That was because NASA was so strongly focused on the moon and Mars."

In 2004, Bush announced that NASA would turn its focus to more manned space missions. The first goal was returning humans to the moon by 2020, and establishing a lunar launchpad for staffed missions to Mars. He proposed a $12 billion budget for the first five years, with $11 billion diverted from existing NASA programs.

The Obama administration remains committed to manned space flights, but it canceled the projected $108 billion return-to-moon plan, called Constellation, a move that's roiling some in Congress. Instead, the administration is seeking international and commercial partnerships for developing manned missions to asteroids and to Mars. The administration also proposed increased funding of $2.4 billion for Earth observation research at NASA.

The White House stated that it's committed to "minimizing -- if not eliminating -- potential gaps in data" in Earth-monitoring satellite activities in the coming decades.

"The urgency to maintain the continuity ... that's out in front of everybody," said Mark Mulholland, a senior official with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "Certainly in the last couple of years there's been an increasing emphasis at the administration level on climate monitoring," he added.

But the Government Accountability Office's Powner said it's clear that stronger leadership is needed for the nation's environmental satellite program, and he said that job belongs to the Office of Science and Technology Policy in the White House.

"We pinned it on OSTP," he said. "They have the responsibility to coordinate these interagency-type, long-term issues."

Without that kind of oversight, Powner said, agencies commonly focus on their own priorities, and fail to commit to long-term plans -- an approach essential for the complex job of designing and launching Earth-observing satellites.

A senior analyst with the technology policy office "did not agree or disagree with our recommendations," the report stated.

Field concurred with Powner's position. He described the dearth of leadership as another serious gap in the nation's Earth-observing satellite program.

"There's nobody in the federal system that's really responsible for ensuring the kind of long-term observations that you want on a planet that's changing," he said.

Suzanne Bohan covers science. Contact her at 510-262-2789. Follow her at Twitter.com/suzbohan.


The 1994 Clinton administration decision to save costs by merging into NPOESS previously separate military and civilian Earth-observing satellite systems backfired, ultimately creating a dysfunctional program plagued by bureaucratic wrangling, delays and cost overruns. In contrast, GOES-R is run by a single civilian agency.

Due to escalating costs, in 2006 numerous climate sensors on NPOESS were cut or "degraded" and the number of satellites were reduced from six to four, in addition to a "preparatory" test satellite. Despite the cuts, the NPOESS program is five years behind schedule, with the preparatory satellite now scheduled to launch in 2011. At nearly $14 billion in cost, it's more than double its original $6.2 billion estimate.

Facing $5 billion in projected overruns, the number of GOES-R launches was also reduced, from four to two. The first is scheduled in 2015, one year behind schedule. Also canceled was a state-of-the-art sensor designed to yield valuable new information about oceans and coastlines, winds, humidity and severe weather events, among other environmental conditions.

A government agency in the spring released two reports warning that the launch delays and sensor cuts threatened to create serious gaps, beginning in 2015, in the nation's ability to monitor key aspects of climate change.

Sensors for forecasting weather were largely spared, but took hits. For example, in the coming years some U.S. military sites could experience up to 70-minute delays in getting weather data. That time lag would particularly affect military operations in the air and on the ocean. An instrument that would have advanced severe weather monitoring was also cut.

President Barack Obama's 2011 budget disbands the tri-agency management of NPOESS to loosen the bureaucratic logjam, putting NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in charge of two of the satellites, in addition to the "preparatory" satellite. The program will be renamed the Joint Polar Satellite System, or JPSS. The Department of Defense will be put in charge of the other two, under a still-unnamed program. GOES-R remains under NOAA management.

In a setback to closing the gaps, in late June the Obama administration canceled a crucial sensor for monitoring how the Earth's temperature changes as the sun's energy fluctuates. The satellite planned under the newly split program is too small to include the instrument.

Sources: Government Accountability Office: April report, "Environmental Satellites: Strategy Needed to Sustain Critical Climate and Space Weather Instruments" and May report, "Polar-Orbiting Environmental Satellites: Agencies Must Act Quickly to Address Risks that Jeopardize the Continuity of Weather and Climate Data"

More Chemtrails Overhead

While much of the western usa is chemtrail-free (see yesterday's Modis pic: http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/index.php?satellite=t1&product=true_color&date=2010_08_21_233), Baja Mexico is getting hammered...





As well as the Gulf of Mexico - below is photo from early this morning:

Climate Weapons

Climate Weapons: More Than Just a Conspiracy Theory?

27.07.2010
Andrei ARESHEV
source: http://en.fondsk.ru/article.php?id=3172&search=fires

The abnormally hot weather in the central regions of Russia has already caused serious economic damage. It has destroyed crops on roughly 20% of the country's agricultural land lots, the result being that the food prices are clearly set to climb next fall. On top of that, fires are raging over peat lands around Moscow. These days, the majority of forecasts concerning the climate are alarming: droughts, hurricanes, and floods are going to be increasingly frequent and severe. Director of the climate and energy program of the Wildlife Fund A. Kokorin says that the current trend is not a random phenomenon and should not be expected to subside (1).

In this particular context, the credibility of projections emanating from the Wildlife Fund, an influential international organization running worldwide operations styled as environment-protection programs, is beyond question (2). The reason is that the global warming which is the subject of heated academic (or, occasionally, absolutely unscholarly) debates is not necessarily an uncontrolled process. At least, the incidence of the current anomalously high temperatures exclusively in Russia and some adjacent territories invites alternative explanations.

Back in the 1970ies, Z. Brzezinski invoked in his Between Two Ages the theme of weather control, which he regarded as a form of broader social regulation. No doubt, the heavyweight of the US geopolitical thinking had to take interest not only in the immediate social but also in the potential geopolitical implications of influencing the climate. He was not the only author to probe into the issue but, due to obvious regards, information on the progress in the sphere of climate weaponry is unlikely to spill over secrecy barriers in the foreseeable future.

M. Chossudovsky, an economics professor from the Ottawa University, wrote in 2000 that in part the ongoing climate change could be triggered by the use of new-generation nonlethal weapons. The US is certainly exploring the possibilities of controlling the climate in several regions of the world. The corresponding technology is being developed in the framework of the High-Frequency Active Aural Research Program» (HAARP) (3), the objective being to build a potential to launch droughts, hurricanes, floods, and earthquakes. From the military standpoint, HAARP is supposed to create a novel type of weapons of mass destruction and an instrument of expansionist policy which can be used to selectively destabilize environmental and agricultural systems of target countries (4). Technically, the system is known to be a set of sources of electromagnetic radiation affecting the ionosphere. It comprises 360 sources and 180 aerials having the height of 22 meters (5). Altogether the station emits 3,600 kW towards the ionosphere, being the world's most powerful system of the kind(6). The program opened in 1990, is jointly funded by the US Office of Naval Research and the US Air Force Research Laboratory, and is implemented by several university laboratories.

Far-reaching hypotheses arise naturally in the situation. Venezuelan leader H. Chavez was ridiculed for attributing the Haiti earthquake to the impact of HAARP but, for example, similar suspicions crept in following the 2008 earthquake in China's Sichuan province. Moreover, there is evidence that the US climate influence program not only spans a number of countries and regions but is also partially based in space. For instance, the X-37B unmanned vehicle orbited on April 22, 2010 reportedly carries new types of laser weaponry. According to New York Times, the Pentagon rejects any connection between X-37B and whatever combat weapons but recognizes that its purpose is to support ground operations and to handle a number of auxiliary tasks (7). The vehicle was built 11 years ago as a part of a NASA program which was taken over by the US Air Force 6 years ago and completely classified (8).

Demands to unveil details of the experimental program put into practice in Alaska are voiced both in the US and in several other countries. Russia never joined the chorus, but the impression is that efforts aimed at deliberate climate change are not a myth, and that in the nearest future Russia – together with the rest of the world – will face a new generation of threats. At the moment the climate weapons may be reaching their target capacity and used to provoke droughts, to erase crops, and to induce various anomalous phenomena in certain countries.

(1) Odnako. – 2010. – № 28. - p. 33.

(2) For details concerning the Wildlife Foundation, see: http://www.globoscope.ru/content/articles/2892/

(3) Program site: http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/. The HAARP station is located in Alaska, 250 km north-east of Ankoridge.

(4) Chossudovsky M. Washington's New World Order Weapons Can Trigger Climate Change // http://www.mindfully.org/Air/Climate-Change-Weapons.htm

(5) http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/gen.html

(6) http://www.kp.ru/daily/24494/648410/

(7) Surveillance Suspected as Spacecraft’s Main Role. By William J. Broad // http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/science/space/23secret.html?_r=1&hp

(8) The Times claimed that the secret unmanned vehicle might be testing laser weapons: http://www.newsru.com/world/24may2010/kosmorazvedhtml

Comment
03.08.2010
B Green
Climate Change
One of the bottom lines for me is the question. What are the consequences for being wrong on this issue?
On one hand we have global calamity. On the other hand we have accelerated movement to sustainable energy production in a post peak oil world. We humans are not living on the Earth in a sustainable fashion. We have the right to commit species suicide we don't have the right to cause suffering and death to others.

Clouds

These 2 photos were taken on the same day, August 20, 2010, here in Panama City Beach, Florida.

Weather Wars

Received this email yesterday...

Are you aware of this website... pretty much explains all...
http://weatherwars.info/?page_id=16
I just read part of this... helps understanding of what might be going on...

QUOTE:
"Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important."
Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn.
http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=674

Chemtrails First Thing in the Morning

On my way to work today was greeted by the white lines...





Then noticed the rainbow effect from the chemicals.




Yesterday snapped this pic showing the ripples from scalar/haarp activity.

Double Red Flag & Obama Visits the Gulf

Friday and Saturday the double red flag waved in the wind which means water is closed to the public. It was changed to single red high hazard by afternoon. Just a coincidence? lol!



The President and his entourage arrived yesterday morning and will be leaving this afternoon. They stayed down the road near Tyndall AFB at a posh hotel and he and daughter Sasha swam in the water to make a commercial for the Gulf to help the local businesses which have suffered finanacial loss due to the oil spill which never hit Panama City Beach apart from a few tar balls.



Early Saturday morning the waves were churning.



Obama arrived mid morning which brought various military aircrafts overhead.



This helicopter hovered for a few minutes in front of this hotel on the beach.



Also as the sky cleared a bit, noticed this 'chembow' caused by the various chemicals being sprayed overhead on a regular basis.





The thing was still there in the same spot an hour later! (below)



Nevertheless, we continue to enjoy the beach, eating healthy (plus diatomaceious earth, organic grape juice, ascorbic acid, cilantro etc) to remove toxins from the body.



And enjoying the evening sunsets.







"Now we exhort you, brethren, warn them that are unruly, comfort the feebleminded, support the weak, be patient toward all [men]. See that none render evil for evil unto any [man]; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all [men]. Rejoice evermore. Pray without ceasing. In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you."
1 Thessalonians 5:14-18

Caught Chemtrails Over Panama City Beach

Update from Northern California

~ Late in the day photo ~

Received the following email today...

Subject: Yesterday ~

Forty-five days since major chemtrail activity, (not counting day 27, which had some morning flyovers)...But, today, the most humungous chemtrail I've ever seen was spread across the entire North State valley, east to west...After so many days free of OBVIOUS flyovers, the ominous sight was jarring...It's been apparent that something has still been (more covertly) going on, (likely higher altitude stuff and/or night time activity), because the tell-tale white, glarey haze is always present on the horizon...Five hours later the giant monster, still hangs in the sky and now new lines have "developed"...Amazing how good they're getting at mimicking cirrus formations, too, (not quite the same, but close)...

Well, fight the good fight and many thanks, for all you do to educate the masses. Being enlightened carries with it the responsibility to protect and serve in our capacity as stewards of the earth. May all who are aware continue to remain strong in the commitment to keep sounding the alarm... Thank you for being there; may you be blessed in all your endeavors.

Best wishes and aloha ~ flower

Silent War In the Sky

The Weaponisation of Culture Part 2.
The Weaponisation of Air: Chemtrails.‏

By Sally Exoudhu,
Sovereign Independent UK Correspondent
July 2010
source: http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=6112

This should have been first. It should have been given top priority in the list of culture weaponisation elements, why? Because whatever chance you have of controlling what you eat or drink, there is no choice whatsoever, when it comes to controlling what is deliberately pumped into your lungs on a daily basis from aircraft. The weaponisation of air is not top of the list because at the time of writing, although people see it with their own eyes, they don’t take the slightest bit of notice of it, thanks to their ‘televisation’, their screenwashing, and the greenwashing of their brain. Had I put this as number one you would probably have switched off and gone back to sleep. You can’t afford to switch off. You are being murdered! It’s that simple. What is the Green Party doing about this global environmental crisis? Nothing!

I saw my first chemtrail about 12 years ago when I was in England, over East Anglia. A military aircraft turned up in a clear blue sky over a shopping precinct, drew a perfect halo, a circle in the blueness of the sky, switched off the spray and just flew casually off again. I watched as the form dispersed and turned into a mushy cloud. Anglia Television calmly described it that evening as ‘Military Maneuvers’. That satisfied everyone supposedly, job done. That’s the only mention I’ve seen on the in-the-banksters’-pocket media about chemtrails apart from the psychopathic nonsense put out by the psychopathically dominated Daily Mail on the 28th of June 2010 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1289893/Attack-vapours–jet-trails-block-sunshine.html

This brainless mafia-controlled rag says it’s all our fault. In typical mafia fashion they blame the victims, the general population, for the genocide, the population reduction. And if that’s not sick enough, the brain-dead readers of this lunacy, actually believe what the propagandists pump into their chemtrailed skulls. They should pay attention to what the aircraft are pumping into their bloodstream via their lungs. They don’t, perhaps that’s why their brains are dead. It’s not only the media that is complicit in this. Where are the doctors, the lawyers, the schoolteachers, the university professors, the police, the military and the politicians? I’ll tell you where they are. They’re all on the mafia banksters’ payroll. That’s where they are. What good is that if you and your children and your grandchildren and all your loved ones are about to die? “I won’t be here forever”, I hear you say, “I’ll pass on my fortune to my children”. No! That’s not the way it works. The weaponised culture is designed to make you sick, stupid and sterile, and that includes you doctor! This aerial spraying has to be stopped NOW and …WE NEED YOU doctor-professor-magistrate-sergeant-minister-archbishop-rabbi-grandmaster-economist. “You’ll have to go back to the reason you entered your profession in the first place”. Hopefully that was to serve your loved ones and protect those less fortunate than yourself, in the knowledge that what goes around comes around, and you could be next to suffer. What goes around comes around! “Who’s going to serve and protect you”? I’m only speaking to the normal ones here, not the psychopaths, bear that in mind. Psychopaths don’t do compassion, they just mimic it.

Back to this chemtrailing atrocity! Sometimes I do despair. I was in the heart of rural Ireland, (Bunclody, Co. Wexford to be precise) a farming town, and the entire sky was a patchwork quilt of sticky gas belched out from aircraft… the whole sky. Everyone, as far as I could see, was totally oblivious to the phenomenon. Farm vehicles trundled leisurely along, tractors and lorries rolled by, people chatted, sat on the benches, ate ice creams, did their shopping, a wedding was taking place at the local church. NOBODY NOTICED THE GAS ATTACK. Now, it seems that the Nazis and Soviets have learned from their mistakes and perfected their system. They have upgraded their propaganda to such an extent that a war can be waged on what they consider to be the unfit, whilst the unfit carry on with their everyday activities. Now that’s what I call the weaponisation of culture. This is the most clever, cunning war ever ‘fought’. The enemy hasn’t a clue that they are the enemy or even that there is a war raging at all. Where are the air raid sirens, the bombs, the doodlebugs? Where is the noise? There is no noise. The bombers are noiseless. Everything is ‘normal’.

We need to look across the pond to Britain for some hard evidence pertaining to the fact that the State salivates in the enjoyment of gassing its own people. Watch these films in a wakeful state and examine the unclassified documents. What more can I say?

http://www.nr23.net/govt/spray.htm

Here’s a short film clip of the air being weaponised with the biological warfare stimulant zinc-cadmium-sulphide dating back to 1958

Valetta Aircraft Spraying The BW Simulant – Zinc Cadmium sulphide

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-3695517097691289788#

And here’s a two part documentary

Top Secret Revealed: episode 1

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=7956939398441775712#

Top Secret Revealed: episode 2

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=7956939398441775712#docid=-1663566962509610222

And here’s another:

Clouds of Secrecy 1.

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-322022035575322462#

Clouds of Secrecy 2.

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-1663566962509610222#

What is in the chemtrails, what are they? Well, you tell me, but in my opinion they are multi-purpose. There’s weather the modification, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsTYbIuC0WI
drugging, poisoning, spraying the so-called ‘organic’ food and groundwater, as if it wasn’t poisoned enough by the brainwashed farmers. Then there’s the link to HAARP through the metallic particles lodged in our lungs. HAARP is a whole other subject, linked nonetheless. Suffice it to say that we are metallic antennae walking about.

I know one thing, if I were a doctor worth my salt with access to documented evidence, I would do my utmost duty the community I serve and make it my business to find out what’s in the spray, and why it’s being done. I would study the health statistics and plot graphs showing the rise or fall in terminal illnesses, chest ailments etc dating back perhaps 100 years and relate it all to the various elements of culture weaponisation, to find out what the hell is going on here. That goes for all the other professionals under attack also, and that’s what it is, and attack on YOU! We do know from America, where more research is being done on this that there is Aluminium Oxide, Barium, Cadmium and Morgellon’s Disease in the spray. Nasty stuff! There exists a lot of confusing information on the internet, but you might try looking at Aerosol Crimes and Cover Up from Clifford E. Carnicom

http://www.carnicom.com/

and for a more thorough investigation of the bigger picture I highly, highly recommend

Don’t Talk About the Weather by a dedicated anonymous film maker.

http://wideeyecinema.com/?p=658

Watch all of it to the end. It tells a very comprehensive and convincing story.

If you’re still not convinced read the United Nations Environmental Modification Treaty signed on May 18th 1977. The ENMOD Treaty Understanding Relating to Article II

‘It is the understanding of the Committee that the following examples are illustrative of phenomena that could be caused by the use of environmental modification techniques as defined in Article II of the Convention: earthquakes, tsunamis; an upset in the ecological balance of a region; changes in weather patterns (clouds, precipitation, cyclones of various types and tornadic storms); changes in climate patterns; changes in ocean currents; changes in the state of the ozone layer; and changes in the state of the ionosphere’.

Step outside the house and watch them doing it! It’s utterly, utterly disgusting!

Let’s look at this from a different angle. We are being sprayed like cockroaches. What happens when you spray insects? They die! Before they die, what happens? I suggest that their lungs clog up, their limbs ache and their immune system breaks down so that any minor illness at all can wipe them out. Chemtrail extermination may not be so sudden but the symptoms are aching limbs, asthma, even in adults where there’s no history of asthma in the family, flu symptoms even in mid-summer, hair loss in men AND WOMEN, loss of short-term and long-term memory.
As regards the memory loss, it’s important to know that the New World Order must wipe out any memory of how things were before, so that there is nothing left to compare the new with the old. The Soviet/fascist Police State must appear normal to the dumb domesticated animals at the bottom of the survival-of-the-fittest pecking order, so that the Darwinist Huxlian Russellian Gods can hold on to their rightful place as world dominators. As George Orwell put it, “history must go down the memory hole”. Here’s another New World Order dominated propagandist rag that some people don’t question:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article1913178.ece

Alzheimer’s cases around the world to quadruple by 2050…Now, How do they know that? Because thay are spraying us with aluminium, that’s how. They’re giving us dementia and Alzheimers in order to wash history down the memory hole. And if you want to believe all this chemtrailing is normal (ie. Not psychopathic) and allow The Times to suck the last morsel of commonsense out of your brain you can pay them to do that and buy their book The Cloudspotters Guide, ISBN-10: 034089590X …good luck to you. The idiotic book was written especially for you. It’s a dishwasher that fits your brain perfectly, and if you really want to know the secret-society history of the two-faced Times of London from the horses mouth, read Carroll Quigley’s book The Anglo-American Establishment: From Rhodes to Cliveden. ISBN 0916728501

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRkCvubUGCM

Then there is the deliberate blotting out of the sun. Without ample Vitamin D the immune system breaks down and you get sick – attacked by any minor illness, which of course is the intention of all this weaponry.

We could go on, but let’s just round up this section here by saying that waking people up to what is being done to them by the sadistic God-complex psychopaths is the most urgent task at hand right now. Millions need to wake up. That’s our only hope, and there is no shortage of counter-intelligence shills out there either, paid to ridicule you. They think there will be a nice soft bed for them in the New World Order Land of Milk and Honey – useful idiots. Use very good judgement, compassion and instinct, and stick to the evidence. Don’t expect any help whatsoever from the bought-off media on this chemtrail thing. It will take moral people with true integrity from all walks of life, working outside the disgustingly corrupt moneyed system, which at all levels is slavery disguised as freedom. It will take people chaining themselves to government buildings, Green Party nests, and especially the mass-media propaganda headquarters, the propaganda pumping stations where so-called reporters paid to be silent on this, thus lying to your face by omission. It may take hunger strikes to wake people up. It may even take martyrdom. I sincerely hope that people wake up before it gets to that stage but, right now, I don’t see it, thanks to the efficiency of the elite-financed psychopathic brainwashing machinery.

This article may seem harsh, and it is. Please don’t think it is an attack on you. It is not. We are all the victims of this unimaginable, horrendous crime, not the perpetrators of it. The perpetrators are psychopaths, and psychopaths know no right or wrong, good or bad. That part of them is non-existant. They see it all merely as applied energy. There is no evil. The end justifies the means, or in other words, it may be murder but at the end of the day it’s just business – moral relativism. We must not get divided and ruled on this. We need to stick together and root out the psychopaths.

There is a price to pay for genocide and we need to find out who is behind it and see to it that these Nazis eugenicists pay that price. It will take hundreds, thousands, maybe millions of people getting right up in their face, standing up and saying:

STOP IT, AND STOP IT NOW!

--- end ---


"Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good."
Romans 12:17-21

Commentary on Chemtrails

Ever Wonder About Chemtrails (chemical trails) in the sky overhead?

Submitted by Monte Smith on Sun, 08/01/2010 - 3:19pm.

source: http://www.thecitywire.com/index.php?q=node/11083

The first I ever heard the term "chemtrail" was in the month of July during the summer of 01' when my wife and I stopped at a little health food store in Harrison, AR. (we were visiting AR at the time and on a camping trip). While doing a bit of shopping we struck up a conversation with the woman working there and, at some point in the conversation, the lady introduced us to the term "chemtrail" followed by a lengthy explanation. The subject was new news for my wife and I and both were instantly interested in the subject. It wasn't but a couple of hours later when we stopped at a State Park by Norfork Lake to have a swim when we looked up and directly overhead was this big X in the sky. Our first chemtrail sighting! Actually, not so. Upon seeing this X that, by the way, just lingered in the sky for a couple of hours or so, realized that we had been seeing these "chemtrails" for years. As it turns out we had been remarking on these incredible contrails and unusual patterns of contrails in the FL skys and throughout our drive from FL to AR. But, we had all along been seeing them as being "jet-trails" or contrails (condensation trails). But, once the different characteristics between the two had been pointed out to us by the lady in the Harrison health food store, it was easy to look up in the sky and distinguish between what were contrails and what were chemtrails.

Since the time of my chemtrail enlightenment I have attempted to pass the enlightenment onto others. However, I have been continually surprised to find that more people than not, that I brought the topic up to, quidkly rejected the information without personal inspection, consideration or discussion. Instead, of a display of curiousity and interest I would generally experience the person throwing out the thought-stopping word...CONSPIRACY as if they were Captain Kirk ordering "Sheilds up!" In any case, once that word was out there it was the empahtic period to the subject being addressed.

This morning I received in my inbox, a credible article that finally acknowledges (and more) the existence and purpose of chemtrails. As I have seen the word chemtrail referenced here on TCW on a few occasions (usually in a derogatory way), I thought I would paste an excerpt from the article and, of course, also include a link to it.

Title: Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and ChemtrailsA Review of the "Case Orange" report

By: Rady Ananda

Excerpt:

At an international symposium held in Ghent, Belgium May 28-30, 2010, scientists asserted that “manipulation of climate through modification of Cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a conspiracy theory.” It is “fully operational” with a solid sixty-year history. Though “hostile” environmental modification was banned by UN Convention in 1978, its “friendly” use today is being hailed as the new savior to climate change and to water and food shortages. The military-industrial complex stands poised to capitalize on controlling the world’s weather.

“In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.” ~World Meteorological Organization, 2007

The only conspiracy surrounding geoengineering is that most governments and industry refuse to publicly admit what anyone with eyes can see. Peer-reviewed research is available to anyone willing and able to maneuver the labyrinth of scientific journals. So, while there is some disclosure on the topic, full public explanation is lacking. A brief list of confirmed cloud seeding events is produced at bottom, starting in 1915.

Going under a variety of names – atmospheric geoengineering, weather modification, solar radiation management, chemical buffering, cloud seeding, weather force multiplication – toxic aerial spraying is popularly known as chemtrails. However, this is merely one technique employed to modify weather. The practice of environmental modification is vast and well funded.

Hosted by the Belfort Group, which has been working for the last seven years to raise public awareness of toxic aerial spraying, the Symposium included chemtrail awareness groups from Greece, Germany, Holland, France and the U.S. Belfort published five videos covering only May 29,[1] when filmmaker Michael Murphy (Environmental Deception and What in the world are they spraying)[2] and aerospace engineer Dr. Coen Vermeeren [3] gave the most dramatic presentations.

Dr Vermeeren, of the Delft University of Technology, presented [4] a 300-page scientific report entitled, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies.” [5]

Case Orange notes it was prepared for the Belfort Group by a team of scientists but presented anonymously. It was sent to embassies, news organizations and interested groups around the world “to force public debate.”

End of Excerpt

Note: the entire article is lengthy and does include several photos.

Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20369

Update from Carole Pellatt

Hello to all,
It's been a while since I sent my last photo essay out. I have a new article about the spraying of the sky called "ARTICLE WITH NO APOLOGY".

http://homepage.mac.com/carolepellatt/No%20Apology/

I hope you will find it insightful and helpful in your search to understand what is going on in the sky.

I have also re-vamped my website www.iseelines.com ( I SEE LINES ), making it easier for people to access the official documentation stored there.

If you feel this article has merit, please pass it along. If you would like to be removed from this mailing list, please email me and I will do so.

Thank you.

truly,
Carole

Tonight's Sunset

This Recent Video is All Over Youtube

And I posted it but the original account is closed, so reposting.

However, after reading through the video comments, I see most are favorable which raises a red flag in my mind since youtube is crawling with disinfo agents. Why little objection to this video?? Is this some sort of 'setup'?

LA Getting Creamed By Chemtrails

Satellite View of Southern California August 1, 2010
http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/index.php?satellite=t1&product=true_color&date=2010_08_01_213

EMAIL RECEIVED THIS MORNING

We're getting CREAMED
Tuesday, August 3, 2010 12:33 AM

Today, and yesterday were perhaps the worst chemtrail days I've ever seen. I went up to the hollywood sign at midnight last night to check out the city, and you could see a blanket of particulate matter just covering the city, and the valley.

If you take a look at the satellite views of the earth, you'll see that the entire coast line is inundated. Those clouds you see off the coast, they are all artificial. That is not natural marine layer. You can see the rainbow, chembow in the satellite photos. If you look at yesterday's close up satellite photos of the Northwest, you can see those big plumes, which look like real clouds are not real clouds. Look closely, and you can see the tell tale trails, expanding into enormous chem clouds. You can see what appear to be "Ship Tracks"

I believe these indeed are ships, spewing out a heavy mix of Sulfur Dioxide. Sulfur dioxide is what creates these masses of artificial clouds over the ocean, then they supplement that with the airplanes.

What's going on I wonder. There must be something more to it. I wonder if perhaps Raytheon got this contract, and they are just doing make-work. I can't imagine there being any practical reason to be putting up all this cloud cover, constantly.

Perhaps the military likes to operate without worrying about satellite recon? But from who?

It's ugly down here, and lots of people, friends of mine are having respiratory problems...although the same people think I'm a total nut for talking about the artificial clouds...although on days like today, people do agree that the clouds all do seem to come from the planes.

'Persistent Contrails' (Contrails are Chemtrails)

Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails A Review of the "Case Orange" report by Rady Ananda

Global Research, July 30, 2010

At an international symposium held in Ghent, Belgium May 28-30, 2010, scientists asserted that “manipulation of climate through modification of Cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a conspiracy theory.” It is “fully operational” with a solid sixty-year history. Though “hostile” environmental modification was banned by UN Convention in 1978, its “friendly” use today is being hailed as the new savior to climate change and to water and food shortages. The military-industrial complex stands poised to capitalize on controlling the world’s weather. “In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.” ~World Meteorological Organization, 2007 Rainmaker Charles Hatfield, in 1915, destroyed much of San Diego. The only conspiracy surrounding geoengineering is that most governments and industry refuse to publicly admit what anyone with eyes can see. Peer-reviewed research is available to anyone willing and able to maneuver the labyrinth of scientific journals. So, while there is some disclosure on the topic, full public explanation is lacking. A brief list of confirmed cloud seeding events is produced at bottom, starting in 1915. Going under a variety of names – atmospheric geoengineering, weather modification, solar radiation management, chemical buffering, cloud seeding, weather force multiplication – toxic aerial spraying is popularly known as chemtrails. However, this is merely one technique employed to modify weather. The practice of environmental modification is vast and well funded. Hosted by the Belfort Group, which has been working for the last seven years to raise public awareness of toxic aerial spraying, the Symposium included chemtrail awareness groups from Greece, Germany, Holland, France and the U.S. Belfort published five videos covering only May 29,[1] when filmmaker Michael Murphy (Environmental Deception and What in the world are they spraying)[2] and aerospace engineer Dr. Coen Vermeeren [3] gave the most dramatic presentations. Dr Vermeeren, of the Delft University of Technology, presented [4] a 300-page scientific report entitled, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies.” [5] Case Orange notes it was prepared for the Belfort Group by a team of scientists but presented anonymously. It was sent to embassies, news organizations and interested groups around the world “to force public debate.” The report spends some time on HAARP, the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, [6] which is a military endeavor focused on ionospheric, electromagnetic, and global electrostatic field manipulation, and on other exotic weapon systems that manipulate the environment. While related, they go beyond this discussion of chemtrails. In the interest of brevity, the health and environmental implications of cloud seeding is not discussed in any depth herein. Case Orange does go into it, as did most of the speakers at the Belfort Symposium. Cursory research reveals a debate among researchers as to chemtrail toxicity, but whether that’s a 50-50 or 99-1 argument is unknown. Contrails Are Chemtrails Case Orange rejects use of the term ‘chemtrails’ because it is associated with amateur conspiracy theorists. The only credible document it could find that uses it is the Space Preservation Act of 2001 introduced by U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH). [7] H.R. 2977 sought to ban the use of exotic weapon systems that would damage climate, weather, tectonic and biological systems. “Chemtrails” are specifically listed. Though later removed, no version of the bill ever became law. Instead, the writers prefer the term ‘persistent contrails’ to describe the phenomenon since all contrails are chemtrails. ‘Persistent contrails’ distinguishes those that contain weather-altering additives from those that represent normal aircraft exhaust that dissipates after a few seconds or minutes. Case Orange also rejects misanthropic intentions behind persistent contrails. It shows that geoengineering is fully operational, but rejects it is used to sicken people on the assumptions that 1) public health agencies have the public interest at heart; and 2) the economy is consumer driven. The authors indicate no awareness of numerous reports of collusion between the pharmaceutical industry and government health agencies. This year, a significant conflict-of-interest report appeared in the prestigious British Medical Journal, which further heightened suspicions that the H1N1 flu and its vaccines were a scam.[8] Nor do the authors consider that sick people will spur economic growth in a capitalist (for profit) health system. Dr. Vermeeren gave his own introductory remarks and conclusions, but spent the bulk of the hour presenting information from Case Orange. He frankly admitted the existence of persistent contrails. “We also know that chemtrails do exist because we do spraying; for crops, for example, and we know that they have been spraying for military purposes. So, chemtrails is nothing new. We know about it.” CLICK LINK Dr Coen Vermeeren Symposium speech, Afternoon Part 1 video, (starting at about 35 mins.) (29 May 2010) http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427 “Weather manipulation through contrail formation … is in place and fully operational.” Case Orange cites publicly available material that shows geoengineering has been ongoing for “at least 60 years.” Used as a weapon of war in Hamburg by the UK during World War II, it was also used in the Vietnam Conflict by the US. Controversy over its use, revealed by investigative reporter Jack Anderson, spurred Senate hearings in 1972. During those hearings, military officials denied the use of cloud seeding technology. Later, a private letter from Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird admitting that his testimony was false surfaced. He, again unbelievably, claimed he didn’t know what was happening. [9] Environmental modification (EnMod) weaponry was finally banned by treaty in 1978. The UN Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques forced the end of such programs, overtly anyway.[10] (Case Orange authors seem unaware of this international ban, as it is one of their recommendations.) However, with widespread reporting of rising global temperatures, increasing population, and degradation of water supplies, renewed interest in EnMod is now becoming broadly supported. (See, e.g., Top economists recommend climate engineering, 4 Sep 2009 [11] and similarly, Top science body calls for geoengineering ‘plan B’, 1 Sep 2009.[12]) The crew in Operation Stormfury in 1963. Note the special belly on the Douglas DC6-B for cloud seeding purposes. (From Case Orange) Building a case for old technology finding a new market, Case Orange discusses several U.S. patents. For example, authors describe a 1975 patent, “Powder Contrail Generation,” [13] for the invention of a: “specific contrail generation apparatus for producing a powder contrail having maximum radiation scattering ability for a given weight [of] material. The seeding material … consists of 85% metallic particles and 15% colloidal Silica and Silica gel in order to produce a stable contrail that has a residence period of 1 up to 2 weeks.” In 2009, researchers published “Modification of Cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” which proposed two methods of delivery for this same proportion of metallics to silica and the same staying power of one to two weeks.[14] Case Orange also reveals a 1991 patent held by Hughes Aircraft Company [15] that: “contains 18 claims to reduce global warming through stratospheric seeding with aluminum oxide… thorium oxide … and refractory Welsbach material ….” The report notes that “the proposed scenario by the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] in 2001 is identical to the claims” in Hughes Aircraft’s 1991 patent. Hughes was acquired by Raytheon, a private defense contractor, in 1997, “the same company that acquired E-systems and the HAARP contract.” Case Orange presents evidence that Raytheon stands to control all weather, which the authors find repugnant given that it is a private corporation. The authors recommend suing private corporations instead of governments. But subcontracting is quite common for governments and agencies, especially the US military. The distinction between large, powerful corporations and governments is a fine line obscure to common folk. And, the effect is the same whether governments are spraying us with nano-sized metals, chemicals or biologicals, or whether corporations do. The authors’ protective posture toward governments is nonsensical. Case Orange suggests that geoengineering found new life in the global warming scare. Old patents are being dusted off and private interests stand to make substantial sums now that Cap and Trade has been exposed as ineffective in reducing greenhouse gases. (Although, lawmakers are still considering it since substantial sums can be made from the scheme, to wit: Al Gore reportedly achieved billionaire status from it.) Since 2007, billionaire Bill Gates has spent at least $4.5 million on geoengineering research. [16] Since reducing emissions is not popular with industry, ‘Plan B’ – geoengineering – is being touted as the answer to climate change and water shortage. A longer description of Plan B is: Add more pollution to the sky and water to offset industrial pollution, without reducing industrial pollution. Human rights and environmental watchdog, ETC Group, describes the momentum [17]: “The roll-out of geoengineering as Plan B is being skillfully executed: prominent high-level panels sponsored by prestigious groups, a spate of peer-reviewed articles this January in science journals, and a line-up of panicked politicians in northern countries, nodding nervously in agreement as scientists testify about the ‘need to research Plan B.’” ETC reports that Gates’ top geoengineering advisor unveiled a plan to grow solar radiation management research “one-hundred-fold, from $10 million to $1 billion over ten years.” Indeed, several watchdog groups recently ramped up calls to address clean water shortage. “At the end of July 2010, the United Nations General Assembly will vote on an important resolution, initiated by the Bolivian government, which would make clean water and sanitation a human right,” reports Food and Water Watch.[18] Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 Case Orange ties a 1996 report by top military personnel in the U.S., “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” [19] to evidentiary details (like governmental spraying schedules, chemical orders, correct nomenclature used in airline operating manuals, and calls for geoengineering by economists) to support its notion of “heavy involvement of governments at top level in climate control projects.” Owning the Weather in 2025 provides a specific timeline for the use of EnMod technologies in cooperation with the Weather Modification Association (WMA), a business-government group promoting the beneficial uses of environmental modification [20]: 2000 Introduce ionic mirrors, with a sharp increase from 2008; 2000-2025 Use chemicals for atmospheric seeding by civilian (as well as military) aviation; 2004 Create smart clouds thru nanotechnology, with exponential increase after 2010; 2005 Introduce ‘carbon black dust’. Though Case Orange decries the paucity of research into EnMod, in 2009 WMA published its position statement on the safety of seeding clouds with silver-iodide, citing three dozen research papers from 1970 through 2006. [21] In 2007, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) published a statement that included “Guidelines for the Planning of Weather Modification Activities.” Acknowledging that the modern technology of weather modification began in the 1940s, it is still “an emerging technology” today. [22] WMO indicated disappointment that research is being abandoned for operations. Case Orange contains no reference to the WMA position statement citing all that research, although it cites the group. Nor does it mention the World Meteorological Organization, an agency of the United Nations, which has a link to its Weather Modification portal on its Index page. At the end of the section, The bare necessity of geoengineering through cloud generation for survival of the planet (5.2.7), Case Orange states: “[O]ur investigation team comes to the conclusion that climate control programs, controlled by the military but approved by governments, are silently implemented in order to avoid the worst case scenarios they obviously do not want. The two basic instruments are temperature control through generation of artificial clouds and manipulation of the ionosphere through ionosphere heaters. “Both remain basically military combat systems with the option to go into the offensive if deemed necessary. However since several ionosphere heaters are installed on various places around the globe one can assume that there is wide cooperation between governments in order to reach the climate targets by 2025: controlling the weather and thus the planet.” The report published the following images provided by a former meteorologist at the Ontario Weather Service, showing spraying schemes for Europe. For December 6, 2008: “The spraying schemes seem to be organized in a logical pattern so that the whole of Europe is covered in a 3-day period,” the authors write. The following images cover January 3-5, 2010: Case Orange agrees that climate change needs to be addressed. Regarding Climate-Gate, the authors suggest that the University of East Anglia deliberately manipulated the climate data to gradually prepare the global population for its future on a hotter planet. They also cite research that supports the notion that climate change is real. During the three-day grounding of most aircraft after 9/11, scientists noticed an increase in temperature of 1.1 °C (2 °F). [23] This is an astounding increase in such a short time frame. The incidence of cloud seeding reports by the public increases exponentially after this. The 1996 military piece, Owning the Weather in 2025, gives climate change skeptics “an insight in what to expect in the 21st century: ‘Current demographic, economic and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn weather modfication ability into capability. In the United States weather modification will likely become part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.’” Recommendations “Persistent contrails,” however, “have a devastating impact on eco-systems on this planet and quality of life in general.” Case Orange joins the call of Bill Gates’ geoengineering advisor and the WMO for new research measuring the impact on human health and the environment from EnMod programs. Case Orange also recommends an immediate and full disclosure of current EnMod activities to the public; and that all civil aviation laws be abided. Of note, in response to policy interest in geoengineering as a means to control climate change and enhance water supplies, on May 14, 2010, the science subcommittee of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity proposed a geoengineering moratorium. [24] This proposed ban on “friendly” EnMod programs will be heard at the Tenth Conference of Parties to UN Convention on Biodiversity in Nagoya, Japan this October. Case Orange reports that China and Russia openly admit to cloud-seeding, while the U.S. denies such activities. The U.S. does permit open air testing of chemical and biological weapons but not under the law the authors cited, which they paraphrased: The secretary of defense may conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological agents on civilian populations. Public law of the United States, Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808, July 30, 1977. Codified as 50 USC 1520, under Chapter 32 Chemical and Biological Warfare Program, Public Law 85-79 was repealed in 1997 by Public Law 105-85. In its place, 15 USC 1520a provides restrictions (such as informed consent). 50 USC 1512, however, allows open air testing of chemicals and biologicals and allows presidential override of notices and of public health considerations for national security reasons. [25] Case Orange authors are thus correct in asserting that such programs are legal in the U.S. Epilogue Having heard enough conspiracy theories to last me a lifetime, I hesitated researching the subject of chemtrails, and maintained skepticism. That all changed in March when I personally observed two jets seeding clouds, along with about 30 other people in the parking lot at lunchtime. Someone took a picture from her cell phone: The trails lasted for hours, and looked distinctly different from other clouds. Since then, I’ve been watching the skies and can now tell when they’ve been seeded. We often have a white haze instead of a deep blue sky, even when persistent contrails aren’t visible. A few days ago, someone sent me a link to the Belfort Symposium videos. Four hours into it, I became riveted when Dr. Vermeeren began his presentation of the Case Orange report. That’s when I decided to seriously look into the subject. As informative as Case Orange is for the newcomer, any serious research into the subject reveals that what all those “conspiracy theorists” suggest is true: they are spraying the skies, and they’re not telling us. Discovering that the World Meteorological Organization has a tab on its website called Weather Modification shocked me. Reading their disappointment that governments are going ahead with operations instead of doing more research confirmed all of it for me. And that was published in 2007! So, while we’re not being told, the information is publicly available to any armchair researcher. Being so late to the game on all this accords me sympathy for others. Military leaders have for centuries recognized that it rains after a heavy battle, but harnessing that power in a way that doesn’t cause a deluge like in San Diego in 1915 has been a task. I came upon other stories like that in my research – misdirected hurricanes, farm wars, massive flooding and mudslides. It’s no wonder there are so many books on the subject. It’s no wonder this turned into a 3,000-word essay. Chemtrails are no hoax; I spent time going to as many original sources as I could find. The record is replete with mainstream news accounts of the early days of the modern EnMod program. If its birth can be marked by Britain’s successful use of chaff in 1943 to jam enemy radar, the program is 67 years old. That’s quite a history to keep under the radar of most people. That reflects most poorly on mainstream news sources, who are supposed to expose government shenanigans. ~~~ A Brief History of Cloud Seeding Cloud seeding, as a US military research project, began as early as the 1830s, according to Colby College professor, James R. Fleming. [26] Verifiably successful rainmaking attempts did not occur until 1915. 1915 To end a prolonged drought, San Diego hired reputed rainmaker Charles Hatfield, who claimed that the evaporation of his secret chemical brew atop wooden towers could attract clouds. San Diego was rewarded with a 17-day deluge that totaled 28 inches. The deadly downpour washed out more than 100 bridges, made roads impassable over a huge area, destroyed communications lines, and left thousands homeless. [27] Charles Hatfield's rain washes out dam 1915, San Diego. Dozens died. 1943 “The first operational use of chaff (aluminium strips which are precisely cut to a quarter of the radar’s wavelength) took place in July 1943, when Hamburg was subjected to a devastating bombing raid. The radar screens were cluttered with reflections from the chaff and the air defence was, in effect, completely blinded.” [28] 1946 General Electric’s Vincent Schaefer dropped six pounds of dry ice into a cold cloud over Greylock Peak in the Berkshires, causing an “explosive” growth of three miles in the cloud. [29] New York dry ice seeding 1946 (Life Magazine) 1947 Australian meteorologists successfully repeated the process. [30] 1949 Project Cirrus: Nobel Laureate Irving Langmuir and General Electric researcher Vincent Schaefer fed ten ounces of silver iodide into a blowtorch apparatus and brought down 320 billion gallons of rain across half of New Mexico from a desert near Albuquerque. [31] 1950 Harvard meteorologist Wallace Howell seeded New York City skies with dry ice and silver iodide smoke, filling the city’s reservoirs to near capacity. [32] 1952 The UK’s Operation Cumulus resulted in 250 times the normal amount of rainfall, killing dozens and destroying landscapes. [33] 1962-1983 Operation Stormfury, a hurricane modification program, had some success in reducing winds by up to 30%. [34] 1966-1972 Project Intermediary Compatriot (later called Pop Eye) successfully seeded clouds in Laos. The technique became part of military actions in Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos from 1967 to 1972. Initially revealed by Jack Anderson in the Washington Post, 18 Mar 1971. [35] 1986 The Soviet air force diverted Chernobyl fallout from reaching Moscow by seeding clouds. Belarus, instead, was hit. [36] China weather rocket (2008 by ImpactLab) 2008 Chinese government used 1,104 cloud seeding missiles to remove the threat of rain ahead of the Olympic opening ceremony in Beijing. [37] 2009 Moscow Halo. Case Orange cites this as evidence of cloud seeding, but others suspect it is electromagnetic in origin. Russian authorities said it was an optical illusion. [38] This is by no means a comprehensive list; indeed, volumes are dedicated to the subject. Notes: [1] Belfort Group videos of International Symposium on Chemtrails, May 29, 2010 proceedings. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/belfort-test [2] Michael Murphy website: http://truthmediaproductions.blogspot.com/ [3] Dr Coen Vermeeren, Delft University of Technology bio, n.d. [4] Dr Coen Vermeeren Symposium speech, Afternoon Part 1 video, (starting at about 35 mins..) (29 May 2010) http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427 [5] Anonymous, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies,” 10 May 2010. PDF without appendices: http://coto2.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/case_orange-5-10-2010-belfort-chemtrails.pdf [6] High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, Fact Sheet, 15 Jun 2007. http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/factSheet.html [7] Space Preservation Act of 2001, H.R.2977, 107th Congress, 1st Session. Introduced by U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich. [8] Deborah Cohen and Philip Carter, “Conflicts of Interest: WHO and the pandemic ‘flu conspiracies,’” British Medical Journal 2010;340:c2912, 3 Jun 2010. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/jun03_4/c2912 [9] The Sunshine Project, “The Limits of Inside Pressure: The US Congress Role in ENMOD,” n.d. Accessed July 2010. http://www.sunshine-project.org/enmod/US_Congr.html [10] United Nations, “Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques,” Resolution 31/72, 10 Dec 1976, effective 1978. Geneva. http://www.un-documents.net/enmod.htm [11] Copenhagen Consensus Center, “Top economists recommend climate engineering,” 4 Sep 2009. Press release [pdf] http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fPress+Releases+2010%2fCC_PRESS_STATEMENT__4september2010_.pdf [12] Catherine Brahic, “Top science body calls for geoengineering ‘plan B’, New Scientist 1 Sep 2009. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17716-top-science-body-calls-for-geoengineering-plan-b.html [13] Donald K. Werle, et al., “Powder contrail generation,” U.S. Patent 3,899,144, 12 Aug 1975. Assignee: U.S. Secretary of the Navy. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=3,899,144.PN.&OS=PN/3,899,144&RS=PN/3,899,144 [14] David L Mitchell and William Finnegan, “Modification of Cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” Environmental Research Letters Vol. 4 No. 4, 30 Oct 2009. Available by subscription: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/4/4/045102 [15] David B. Chang and I-Fu Shih, “Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming,” U.S. Patent 5,003,186, 26 Mar 1991. Assignee: Hughes Aircraft Company. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,003,186.PN.&OS=PN/5,003,186&RS=PN/5,003,186 [16] Eli Kintisch, “Bill Gates Funding Geoengineering Research,” Science Insider, 26 Jan 2010. http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/01/bill-gates-fund.html. [17] ETC Group, “Top-down Planet Hackers Call for Bottom-up Governance: Geoengineers’ Bid to Establish Voluntary Testing Regime Must Be Opposed,” 11 Feb 2010. http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/5073 [18] Food and Water Watch: http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/water/world-water/right/ [19] Col Tamzy J. House, et al. “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025,” Department of Defense U.S. Air Force, 17 Jun 1996. Publicly released August 1996. Reproduced at Federation of American Scientists: http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-1.htm [20] Weather Modicaton Association website: http://www.weathermodification.org/ [21] Weather Modification Association, “Position Statement on the Environmental Impact of Using Silver Iodides as a Cloud Seeding Agent,” July 2009. http://www.weathermodification.org/AGI_toxicity.pdf [22] World Meteorological Organization, “WMO Statement on Weather Modification,” UN Commission for Atmospheric Sciences Management Group, 26 Sep 2007. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/WM_statement_guidelines_approved.pdf [23] Donald J. Travis, et al. “Contrails reduce daily temperature range,” Nature 418, 601, 8 Aug 2002. Reproduced in full by University of Washington, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences: http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~rennert/etc/courses/pcc587/ref/Travis-etal2002_Nature.pdf [24] Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, “In-depth Review of the Work on Biodiversity and Climate Change, Draft Recommendation,” Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environmental Programme, UNEP/CBD/SBTTA/14/L.9, 15 May 2010. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-14/in-session/sbstta-14-L-09-en.pdf [25] United States Code, Title 50, Chapter 32, “Chemical and Biological Warfare Program.” http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/50C32.txt [26] James Rodger Fleming, “The pathological history of weather and climate modification: Three cycles of promise and hype,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2006. Available at http://www.colby.edu/sts/06_fleming_pathological.pdf [27] Stephen Cole, “Weather on Demand,” American Heritage, 2005. http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2005/2/2005_2_48.shtml [28] Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese, “The History of Radar,” BBC, 14 Jul 2003. http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A591545 [29] Fleming, citing New York Times, 15 Nov 1946, 24. [30] Squires, P. & Smith, E. J., “The Artificial Stimulation of Precipitation by Means of Dry Ice,” Australian Journal of Scientific Research, Series A: Physical Sciences, vol. 2, p.232, 1949AuSRA…2..232S, 1949. Republished at Harvard University: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1949AuSRA…2..232S/0000244.000.html Also see: Stephen Cole, “Weather on Demand,” American Heritage, 2005. http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2005/2/2005_2_48.shtml [31] Life Magazine, “Solution to Water Shortage: Rain makers’ success shows how New York could fill its reservoirs,” p. 113, 20 Feb 1950. http://books.google.com/books?id=FVMEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA113&dq=Irving+Langmuir&as_pt=MAGAZINES&cd=1#v=onepage&q=Irving%20Langmuir&f=false [32] Life Magazine, “U.S. Water: We can supplement our outgrown sources at a price,” 21 Aug 1950, p. 52. http://books.google.com/books?id=wUoEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA52&lpg=PA52&dq=Irving+Langmuir+rainmaker&source=bl&ots=Ehqq8hZNsE&sig= tkN51NoxqMsKVq6ClZU9Hvej8g0&hl=en&ei=9mhMTO3vG93llQfjpJHGDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CCIQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false [33] John Vidal and Helen Weinstein, “RAF rainmakers ’caused 1952 flood’: Unearthed documents suggest experiment triggered torrent that killed 35 in Devon disaster,” The Guardian, 30 Aug 2001. http://www.guardian.co.uk/silly/story/0,10821,544259,00.html Also see: BBC News, “Rain-making link to killer floods,” 30 Aug 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1516880.stm [34] Jerry E. Smith, “Weather Warfare: The Military’s Plan to Draft Mother Nature,” Adventures Unlimited Press, 2006. pp. 47-54. http://books.google.com/books?id=G7t260XD8AYC&pg=PA47&dq=stormfury&hl=en&ei=9wJ OTOfVE4G88gbZ3IGaDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=stormfury&f=false [35] ibid. pp. 54-60. [36] Richard Gray, “How we made the Chernobyl rain,” Daily Telegraph, 22 Apr 2007. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1549366/How-we-made-the-Chernobyl-rain.html [37] Ian O’Neill, “The Chinese Weather Manipulation Missile Olympics,” Universe Today, 12 Aug 2008. http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/12/the-chinese-weather-manipulation-missile-olympics/ [38] Anonymous, “Moscow Halo,” cell phone video uploaded to YouTube, 7 Oct 2009. reposted at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXF9HSB627U

Rady Ananda is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by Rady Ananda

source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20369